If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
And it’s only going to get worse. The White House, politicians, political activist, and MSM are giving them the green light. They are emboldening them.
[A similar thing just happened in Kentucky too.](https://www.lex18.com/news/covering-kentucky/sb-150-protesters-released-from-jail-after-disrupting-house-vote)
Wait, Newsbusters didn't have any footage of any "rioting" or "violent" protests. They did storm the capitol to protest, but where's the evidence of riots or violence? Did anyone actually even CLICK on the link?
"I don't understand the civil rights movement, not like you can show me proof that the people protesting were being lynched" also you all comparing storming a government building over false claims of a stolen election and storming a government building over kids getting gunned down in schools is comedy
You can call it whatever you want insurrection, protest, guided tour over the walls idgaf but one was for a dumbass reason and one was for kids dying ffs. How can you even argue that they're equal?
One was because almost half the voting country believed their primary democratic right to select their President was stolen, what you call a *dumbass reason*, but the other is based on claims with no evidence to back it up. There is no data showing these kids are being hunted down and killed, and it was a member of their own community who killed the kids in Nashville.
It seems like there is far more hetro-hate in our society today than the opposite, but for people like you, it is ok for your side to do it.
You are the problem here, you insist that your ideology has to be unconditionally accepted and if it isn't then all options up to and including violence are perfectly acceptable. But you will not give the other side the opportunity to even discuss their opinions. Shouting down Judges, constant lawfare attacks against Christian bakers, storming State capitols, fire bombing pregnancy crisis centers, all of that is perfectly ok because it supports your side, but the minute someone pushes back or challenges you then all the sudden you scream you're being a victim of hate crimes.
There's a hell of a lot of hate right now and it is almost all flowing from left to right. The difference is the right doesn't try to shut you down.
Conservatives believe liberals are mis-informed but can still be engaged with and perhaps persuaded, Leftists believe Conservatives are evil and must be destroyed.
There is no middle ground in this country any more and everyone of your comments proves why.
There is so much bullshit to unpack here that it's hard to know where to start. Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence. People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s and drive trucks through crowds. Your political party screams about government overreach but your politicians regularly legislate against freedoms because of an old book and the left are the misinformed ones?
And misinformed on what exactly? Human rights aren't politics. Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools.
You claim MY ideology needs to be unconditionally accepted. Do you know what my "ideology" is somehow?
>Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence.
Go read some polls and see how many people believe it was stolen, just because all of them didn't show up doesn't dispute that fact. And, as evidence continues to mount, it is appearing there were just as many agitators and federal operatives in the crowd as Trump supporters.
But I can say the same thing about your kids storming the State house, or the George Floyd rioters, they've all been brain washed into believing there's crime against *their communities* that doesn't exist. But you feel that justifies their law breaking.
>People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s and drive trucks through crowds.
You'll have to show me evidence of these claims, but even so, where has anyone carrying an AR15 at a *pride event* actually incited any violence In fact, where has there been any violence at a *pride event* initiated by someone on the right? I've seen numerous reports of Antifa and BLM and LGBTQ+ whatever groups showing up at conservative rallies and causing disruption and violence, but you'll have to provide evidence the opposite happened. And I mean incite, don't try to show as evidence where conservatives showed up at an event to protest, were attacked and then defended themselves.
And uh, the last time I heard about a truck driving through a crowd it was in Wisconsin during the Christmas parade and definitely wasn't a *person on the right*. But in that case, it was the truck's fault, not the driver, right?
>Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools.
Which side actively openly uses violence to shut down the opposite side at every opportunity? One group wants to continue life with the societal norms they grew up with, that should be their right, no? But they are attacked, maligned, and cancelled for their chosen lifestyle and people like you cheer that on. But they aren't the ones that violently attack to shut down the other side. So I'm not surprised you find it hilarious, you're all in favor of any violence that supports your ideology.
You expose your ideology when you refuse to accept that what your side is doing is just as wrong as what you claim the other side is doing. You expose your ideology when you continue to make unsubstantiated claims of violence to back up your support of the crimes and violent acts being perpetrated by one side. If it wasn't for double standards, the left would have no standards, and you continue to push the hypocrisy.
So yeah, I figure I can *somehow* deduce your ideology.
> There is so much bullshit to unpack here that it's hard to know where to start.
That's also my response to your comment.
> Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence.
A third of *Democrats* believed the election was stolen. Most Republicans did, because it was that obvious. There was lots of evidence - you just didn't hear about it if you watched the MSM, or looked in most places on social media, because the Federal Government was working with both to suppress any mention of it (see the Twitter Files). The vast majority of election cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. Cases filed before the election were dismissed because no harm had yet occurred. Cases filed during the election were dismissed because there wasn't time to adjudicate them before the election would be over. Cases filed after the election were dismissed because it was too late to do anything about it.
Of the few cases where evidence *was* considered, Republicans won two thirds.
> People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s
...yep - because when they don't, they get mobbed and beaten by antifa. ...or ambush-murdered.
> and drive trucks through crowds
Not familiar with the particular incident you're describing, so I'll have to ask a few questions:
1. Was the crowd on a sidewalk, or in the road?
2. Were they surrounding the vehicle preventing it from moving?
3. Were they beating on the vehicle, trying to break in and pull out the driver?
4. Were they shooting at the vehicle?
I ask those questions because leftist rioters have done some or all of those things in a wide variety of incidents, and in almost all the ones I am aware of, driving through the crowd was the only way for the driver to get out alive.
The one exception is a group of leftist protesters that decided to block a highway at 2AM, and a Nigerian immigrant chose that night and highway to take a little trip. He avoided a group of protesters, but was unable to avoid the second group, and a couple of people died.
> Your political party screams about government overreach but your politicians regularly legislate against freedoms because of an old book and the left are the misinformed ones?
The "freedoms" they're legislating against are the "freedom" to sexualize and mutilate children, and the "freedom" to hide that you are doing that from their parents. It was only a couple of decades ago that doing those things would (at best) land you in prison.
> Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools.
The latest set of dead bodies in a school were made by a leftist, attacking people on the right. That leftist chose *that* school over their primary targets because unlike the other ones they wanted to murder children at, this one had no armed people protecting it.
How is the reason irrelevant? Sorry but this is reason enough for more than a so called "peaceful protest" but then again I'm not a bootlicker so I'm sure most people in here will disagree with me on that.
It's not being a bootlicker, it's using common sense.
Storming a government building with the "intent to disrupt democracy in action" (remember that phrase?) is the same as storming a government building with the "intent to disrupt democracy in action." It doesn't matter *why* the action was performed when it's the action that matters.
There are ways you "peacefully protest" without acting like an insurrectionist.
Peacefully protesting is an oxymoron that's my point. There are good and bad reasons to do things why is that hard to understand? I support government officials feeling unsafe and their buildings being raided by justifiably upset citizens. Again, when they have good reason.
That's garbage. The law isn't subjective, based on what somebody deems "good" or "worthy." The action either *is* or *isn't* legal.
>I support government officials feeling unsafe and their buildings being raided
You could have just said you're a Nazi Brown Shirt and saved me the time.
Also, we don't know what's true or false anymore because ALL politicians seem to be a bunch of liars, the MSM constantly twists stories to fit a narrative etc. You could say the election wasn't stolen and I can say it was, but NEITHER of us know the facts because our own government lies and colludes with media to hide shit from us. This isn't partisan. Both sides are guilty and it's getting old.
Yes it's actually different and yes one of the reasons I stated is a logical reason to be upset with the government and one is not and it legitimately has nothing to do with democratic or republican. You say anyone else's reason like you have more than one.
No I said anyone else's reason because you're saying it's ok for THIS cause, but not another, thus being a hypocrite. I don't condone either attack on any capital. THAT'S my point. You're saying it's ok to do for reasons YOU agree with but nothing else. That's the definition of hypocrisy.
I would say the parents raising these creatures are more detrimental than any gun. Spoiled, entitled, no job, think they are the opposite sex....I could go on.
What were you expecting? Honest, accurate coverage of the events of the day?
As Lenin once explained, the only law that exists for leftists is who and whom.
Quoting Lenin. How patriotic.
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
Is your next quote from David Koresh?
And it’s only going to get worse. The White House, politicians, political activist, and MSM are giving them the green light. They are emboldening them.
[A similar thing just happened in Kentucky too.](https://www.lex18.com/news/covering-kentucky/sb-150-protesters-released-from-jail-after-disrupting-house-vote)
Guess who runs the major network news media?
Soros nazi leftists pack lol.
Leftists
Were they allowed in the rotunda?
Oh yeah, this type of insurrection will eliminated the 2A overnight.
Of course not, they are too focused on Trumps case. no surprise here.
Wait, Newsbusters didn't have any footage of any "rioting" or "violent" protests. They did storm the capitol to protest, but where's the evidence of riots or violence? Did anyone actually even CLICK on the link?
When did rioting or violence become a necessary element? Biden said J6 was worse than 9-11 and there wasn't any violence there.
So we use the same definitions as the left now?
Those are kids, probably angry they keep getting killed.
Who is killing them?
People with guns.
Where's evidence of killing *those kids* that are storming the capitol?
"I don't understand the civil rights movement, not like you can show me proof that the people protesting were being lynched" also you all comparing storming a government building over false claims of a stolen election and storming a government building over kids getting gunned down in schools is comedy
So in other words you don't have any evidence. Either both are an *insurrection* or neither are. It isn't ok for one reason and not another.
You can call it whatever you want insurrection, protest, guided tour over the walls idgaf but one was for a dumbass reason and one was for kids dying ffs. How can you even argue that they're equal?
One was because almost half the voting country believed their primary democratic right to select their President was stolen, what you call a *dumbass reason*, but the other is based on claims with no evidence to back it up. There is no data showing these kids are being hunted down and killed, and it was a member of their own community who killed the kids in Nashville. It seems like there is far more hetro-hate in our society today than the opposite, but for people like you, it is ok for your side to do it. You are the problem here, you insist that your ideology has to be unconditionally accepted and if it isn't then all options up to and including violence are perfectly acceptable. But you will not give the other side the opportunity to even discuss their opinions. Shouting down Judges, constant lawfare attacks against Christian bakers, storming State capitols, fire bombing pregnancy crisis centers, all of that is perfectly ok because it supports your side, but the minute someone pushes back or challenges you then all the sudden you scream you're being a victim of hate crimes. There's a hell of a lot of hate right now and it is almost all flowing from left to right. The difference is the right doesn't try to shut you down. Conservatives believe liberals are mis-informed but can still be engaged with and perhaps persuaded, Leftists believe Conservatives are evil and must be destroyed. There is no middle ground in this country any more and everyone of your comments proves why.
There is so much bullshit to unpack here that it's hard to know where to start. Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence. People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s and drive trucks through crowds. Your political party screams about government overreach but your politicians regularly legislate against freedoms because of an old book and the left are the misinformed ones? And misinformed on what exactly? Human rights aren't politics. Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools. You claim MY ideology needs to be unconditionally accepted. Do you know what my "ideology" is somehow?
>Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence. Go read some polls and see how many people believe it was stolen, just because all of them didn't show up doesn't dispute that fact. And, as evidence continues to mount, it is appearing there were just as many agitators and federal operatives in the crowd as Trump supporters. But I can say the same thing about your kids storming the State house, or the George Floyd rioters, they've all been brain washed into believing there's crime against *their communities* that doesn't exist. But you feel that justifies their law breaking. >People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s and drive trucks through crowds. You'll have to show me evidence of these claims, but even so, where has anyone carrying an AR15 at a *pride event* actually incited any violence In fact, where has there been any violence at a *pride event* initiated by someone on the right? I've seen numerous reports of Antifa and BLM and LGBTQ+ whatever groups showing up at conservative rallies and causing disruption and violence, but you'll have to provide evidence the opposite happened. And I mean incite, don't try to show as evidence where conservatives showed up at an event to protest, were attacked and then defended themselves. And uh, the last time I heard about a truck driving through a crowd it was in Wisconsin during the Christmas parade and definitely wasn't a *person on the right*. But in that case, it was the truck's fault, not the driver, right? >Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools. Which side actively openly uses violence to shut down the opposite side at every opportunity? One group wants to continue life with the societal norms they grew up with, that should be their right, no? But they are attacked, maligned, and cancelled for their chosen lifestyle and people like you cheer that on. But they aren't the ones that violently attack to shut down the other side. So I'm not surprised you find it hilarious, you're all in favor of any violence that supports your ideology. You expose your ideology when you refuse to accept that what your side is doing is just as wrong as what you claim the other side is doing. You expose your ideology when you continue to make unsubstantiated claims of violence to back up your support of the crimes and violent acts being perpetrated by one side. If it wasn't for double standards, the left would have no standards, and you continue to push the hypocrisy. So yeah, I figure I can *somehow* deduce your ideology.
> There is so much bullshit to unpack here that it's hard to know where to start. That's also my response to your comment. > Half the country wasn't at January 6th but the ones who were were there because they were easily brainwashed into believing that half the country thought the election was stolen based on no actual evidence. A third of *Democrats* believed the election was stolen. Most Republicans did, because it was that obvious. There was lots of evidence - you just didn't hear about it if you watched the MSM, or looked in most places on social media, because the Federal Government was working with both to suppress any mention of it (see the Twitter Files). The vast majority of election cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. Cases filed before the election were dismissed because no harm had yet occurred. Cases filed during the election were dismissed because there wasn't time to adjudicate them before the election would be over. Cases filed after the election were dismissed because it was too late to do anything about it. Of the few cases where evidence *was* considered, Republicans won two thirds. > People on the right march on pride events open carrying AR 15s ...yep - because when they don't, they get mobbed and beaten by antifa. ...or ambush-murdered. > and drive trucks through crowds Not familiar with the particular incident you're describing, so I'll have to ask a few questions: 1. Was the crowd on a sidewalk, or in the road? 2. Were they surrounding the vehicle preventing it from moving? 3. Were they beating on the vehicle, trying to break in and pull out the driver? 4. Were they shooting at the vehicle? I ask those questions because leftist rioters have done some or all of those things in a wide variety of incidents, and in almost all the ones I am aware of, driving through the crowd was the only way for the driver to get out alive. The one exception is a group of leftist protesters that decided to block a highway at 2AM, and a Nigerian immigrant chose that night and highway to take a little trip. He avoided a group of protesters, but was unable to avoid the second group, and a couple of people died. > Your political party screams about government overreach but your politicians regularly legislate against freedoms because of an old book and the left are the misinformed ones? The "freedoms" they're legislating against are the "freedom" to sexualize and mutilate children, and the "freedom" to hide that you are doing that from their parents. It was only a couple of decades ago that doing those things would (at best) land you in prison. > Saying that the hate is flowing from left to right is genuinely hilarious considering the right is so stuck on keeping their antiquated ideals alive that they're willing to ignore dead bodies in the halls of schools. The latest set of dead bodies in a school were made by a leftist, attacking people on the right. That leftist chose *that* school over their primary targets because unlike the other ones they wanted to murder children at, this one had no armed people protecting it.
>storming a government building Stop right there: that's your headline. The reason for the insurrection is irrelevant.
How is the reason irrelevant? Sorry but this is reason enough for more than a so called "peaceful protest" but then again I'm not a bootlicker so I'm sure most people in here will disagree with me on that.
It's not being a bootlicker, it's using common sense. Storming a government building with the "intent to disrupt democracy in action" (remember that phrase?) is the same as storming a government building with the "intent to disrupt democracy in action." It doesn't matter *why* the action was performed when it's the action that matters. There are ways you "peacefully protest" without acting like an insurrectionist.
Peacefully protesting is an oxymoron that's my point. There are good and bad reasons to do things why is that hard to understand? I support government officials feeling unsafe and their buildings being raided by justifiably upset citizens. Again, when they have good reason.
That's garbage. The law isn't subjective, based on what somebody deems "good" or "worthy." The action either *is* or *isn't* legal. >I support government officials feeling unsafe and their buildings being raided You could have just said you're a Nazi Brown Shirt and saved me the time.
Also, we don't know what's true or false anymore because ALL politicians seem to be a bunch of liars, the MSM constantly twists stories to fit a narrative etc. You could say the election wasn't stolen and I can say it was, but NEITHER of us know the facts because our own government lies and colludes with media to hide shit from us. This isn't partisan. Both sides are guilty and it's getting old.
So it's a case of "it's (D)ifferent". You literally just admitted it. Your reason is ok. Anyone else's reason bad.
Yes it's actually different and yes one of the reasons I stated is a logical reason to be upset with the government and one is not and it legitimately has nothing to do with democratic or republican. You say anyone else's reason like you have more than one.
No I said anyone else's reason because you're saying it's ok for THIS cause, but not another, thus being a hypocrite. I don't condone either attack on any capital. THAT'S my point. You're saying it's ok to do for reasons YOU agree with but nothing else. That's the definition of hypocrisy.
I would say the parents raising these creatures are more detrimental than any gun. Spoiled, entitled, no job, think they are the opposite sex....I could go on.
Did they have zip ties?
Let's not ignore it. Thanks for posting.